Yes.

balloons_fall fair
Today I read and share;
By necessity, the complexity of visual arts research practice has to bridge disciplines, and in doing so, not only opens up new possibilities such as those on offer within the newer information technologies, but it also renders moot old arguments that see inquiry as methods bound rather than issues driven. For the artist-theorist completing projects within the academic setting, the methods deployed in surrounding a research problem will be necessarily broad yet grounded in personal and public relevance. Whether undertaking research in art or about art, the artist-theorist becomes involved in a set of practices that must be defensible. The aim of research in visual arts, as in other similar forms of exploratory inquiry, is to provoke, challenge, and illuminate rather than confirm and consolidate. Making informed choices about creative ends and means involves selecting, adapting, and constructing ways of working and ways of seeing. To do this, one has to construct the tools of inquiry from an array of practices. Yet when working from a base in contemporary art, the conceptions of the discipline are uncertain, the informing parameters are open-ended, yet the opportunity for inventive inquiry is at hand. In these circumstances, the artist-theorist is seen to be participating in a postdisciplinary, relational and transformative practice.
Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Arts
(p. 178-179)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s